Information for contributors
In order to unify criteria on the content and format of the journal, all articles to be published in Cuadernos Jovellanistas. De la Ilustración a la Modernidad must conform to the following editing requirements:
Articles
The Traditional or Latin-Humanistic Referencing System, also known as the Quote-Note Referencing System or Oxford Referencing System, will be used for the editing of the articles. The Traditional Referencing System is based on the international standards ISO 690 and 690-2.
Only original works that have not been previously published, or have not been simultaneously submitted to another publication will be considered for publication.
Original articles in Spanish and in English will be accepted. Articles in English will not exceed 50% of the articles published in each issue.
Title, abstract, keywords
The title will appear in Spanish and English, in 16-point size, Times New Roman letter font.
It will include an abstract in Spanish and in English (between 150 and 200 words each), in 10-point size, Times New Roman letter font, with their corresponding 5-8 key words (key words) describing the content of the work to help indexers to classify the article.
Length and format
Articles should not be no more than 25 pages long, typed, A-4 paper size, double-spaced, 35 lines per page, 12” Times New Roman. The text cannot exceed 70,000 characters, including spaces, notes and bibliography.
The sections and subsections within the articles should use numerals. Do not leave spaces between paragraphs (except for indented citations mentioned in the previous section) and start each paragraph with a 1 cm indentation.
In articles, a bibliography at the end of the work is not required, since the author offers timely references throughout the citation footnotes.
Footnotes
Footnotes (9-point size) shall be numbered consecutively in Arabic characters and flown over the text and never in parentheses or in superscript between parentheses. Punctuation may not precede the footnote number. Exceptions will be question marks and exclamation signs (eg.: When did the discovery take place?1 rather than: When did the discovery take place1?).
Authors’ surnames will be in Small Caps.
Further requirements:
(a) Book or monograph:
Author’s name and SURNAME if it is cited for the first time, title of the work (book, article, book chapter), (SURNAME, thereafter, and shortened title), place of publication, publisher, year and page/s.
Example:
José Miguel CASO GONZÁLEZ, La poética de Jovellanos, Madrid, Editorial Prensa Española, 1972, pp. 78-80.
(b) Article:
Name and SURNAME of the author if cited for the first time, title of the article between «Spanish inverted commas», followed by the title of the journal (in italics), number or volume of the journal, year, page (p.) or pages (pp.).
Example:
Genara PULIDO TIRADO, «La escritura epistolar en la actual encrucijada genérica». Signa. Revista de la Asociación Española de Semiótica, Núm. 10, 2001, p. 436.
(c) Collective volume:
In case of a collective work, the acronym Vv. Aa. they will be used to refer to the generic authorship of the work, or to the authors as in the previous example: title, place, publisher, date, pages, adding, where appropriate, to the name of the editor(s) or coordinator(s) the abbreviation (ed.) (co-ord.), and (eds.) or (co-ords.) if more than one.
Examples:
Vv. Aa., Cuadernos de Investigación. Gijón, Fundación Foro Jovellanos del Principado de Asturias, Año 2008, núm. 2, 2009.- 235 pp.
Jesús MENÉNDEZ PELÁEZ, «El teatro escolar latino-castellano», Javier Huerta Calvo, (dir.). In Historia del Teatro Español. Vol. I. De la Edad Media al Siglo de Oro, Madrid, Gredos, 2003, pp. 581-608.
(d) Periodical publications:
To quote works in periodical publications: surname of the author or authors in small caps, followed by the name in lower case, title of the article in quotes, name of the volumes or journal in italics, number, publisher, city, year and pages.
Examples:
Íñigo NORIEGA, «Vigencia y necesidad de Jovellanos», El Comercio, Gijón, on December 27, 2009, p. 2.
Santos M. CORONAS, «“Entre Minerva y Temis”: magistrados y poetas en la España de la Ilustración». In Anuario de historia del derecho español, 74, BOE, Ministerio de Justicia, Madrid, 2004, pp. 59-96.
(e) Texts from Internet Sources:
Ana RUEDA, «Jovellanos en sus escritos íntimos: el paisaje y la emoción estética de lo sublime». En Revista de literatura, 68 (136), pp. 489-502.
Retrieved on 14-08-2010, URL: http://revistadeliteratura.revistas.csic.es/index.php/ revistadeliteratura/article/view/17/19
(f) Repeated references
In the successive references to a previously cited work Ibid., Op. cit., or similar expressions should be omitted, including, in all cases, its author and abbreviated title in small caps and the abbreviated work title.
Verbatim quotes
Quotes from verbatim passages of more than two lines included in the article will be offered in a separate paragraph, with a blank space before and another one after it, indented, with no quotes, in 11-point Times New Roman font. Brief quotations within the text will always go between Spanish inverted commas and in round hand.
Graphs, maps, charts and tables
Graphs, maps, statistical tables, tables and figures shall include information about their sources. They will be suitably titled and numbered with Arabic numbers consecutively and references in the text, if any, will be made to this number, so that their location can be altered if required by the font setting.
Portadas should be sent preferably in digital format JPG and TIFF over 300 pixels.
The use of bold letters and italics
The use of bold letters is restricted to titles, subtitles or captions. However, if what is intended is that the reader easily finds a point of the text or just draw a lot of attention, bold letters may be suitable, although over-use can lead to incorrect and superfluous use.
Italics within the text should be used to give emphasis to a word or a phrase. The main use of italics is point out the words that, without being proper names, do not have a use according to the Spanish Lexicon: foreign words, terms used improperly, textual quotation of a phrase or short text. Bibliography and footnotes, which are dealt with elsewhere, are thus excluded.
The use of quotation marks and other signs
Spanish or angular quotes will be used exclusively, and only within an already quoted period double or English quotes will be used, and within those quotes the single ones.
Example:
«He said: “that did not ‘Jovino’ write it anywhere”.»
Saxon or straight quotes (“”) shall not be used in any case. Titles of articles (both from journals and periodic press), speeches, chapters of books and sundries, texts, periods, phrases and words taken from other authors, the terms or phrases with a familiar and figurative sense, all of them will go in inverted commas.
Hyphens (-) are used to join two parts of a compound term (eg.: bio-bibliography) or to indicate the division of a word that does not fit into a line and is continued in the following. Therefore their function is not to indicate periods, sentences, clarification or interjections, whose orthographic sign are parentheses () or, often, commas.
In the case of interjections between parentheses a minus sign will be used, which is a longer dash (–). In Word no word must be fragmented manually at the end of the line. The omission of phrases or paragraphs in sentences shall be done by means of bracketed ellipsis: «Sabia máxima fue siempre […] la de comenzar por el principio».
Centuries, paging in Roman numerals, ordinals for monarchs, nobility titles, volumes, shall be typed in CAPITALS or small capitals.
Some frequently used Latin terms and abbreviations
They are typed in italics, respecting the English spelling: infra, vid, idem (íd.), cfr., passim, apud (according to the DRAE), v. gr., e. gr., loc. cit., sic, supra, etc. Not to be used: Ibid, op. cit. (cf.: Footnotes, f) Repeated references).
cfr. (always lower case, even at the beginning of a paragraph or note), means confer = consult. It can refer to an author, a work, an article, and is used when there is no express quotation in the text, but only a reference or a call for attention.
See: it is similar or equivalent to cfr.
Idem, Latin pronoun meaning “the same” or “the same”.
In quotations, apud means “in the work of such author”, “in the book of” or “taken from”.
Passim, Latin adverb (“everywhere”); when used to mean that an idea is expressed in several places or throughout the referenced work.
Sic, “it is so in the original”, in the case of misprints, misspellings or miscellaneous nonsense.
P./pp. = Page / pages.
Proofreading
Once the manuscripts have been accepted for publication, the authors will have to actively collaborate in the revision, if necessary, of format and style, following the indications of the publishers. They will then receive a proof for final correction, in pdf format, to their e-mail address.
Publishing rights
The publishing rights belong to the FFJPA, and permission is required for partial or total reproduction. The publication of works does not give rise to any payment.
The Editorial Board will respect the intellectual freedom of the authors, although it will not necessarily share the opinions expressed by them.
REVIEWS
Reviews may be up to 10 typewritten pages and a half spaced, on DIN A-4 sheets, with a maximum of 25,000 characters without spaces. The books reviewed must have been published during the two years prior to the corresponding issue of Cuadernos Jovellanistas.
Proposals are to be sent to cuadernosjovellanistas@gmail.com. The journal editors will acknowledge receipt by email.
The authors will have to indicate that their works are original and have not been published previously, nor have they been sent simultaneously to another publication.
The editors (Dr. María José Álvarez Faedo and Dr. Juan Álvarez Díaz) will submit the proposals, independently and anonymously, to two external evaluators, members of the scientific committee of CUADERNOS JOVELLANISTAS. They shall endeavour to inform as soon as possible of the result (always before two months), and of the revisions to be undertaken by the authors.
Proposals are accepted in Spanish and English (provided that the language proficiency in the latter is that of a native speaker). The proportion of Articles in English can reach up to 50% in each number.
The journal Cuadernos Jovellanistas. De la Ilustración a la Modernidad adheres to the international codes of ethics established by the Commitee on Publications Ethics (Code of Conduct and Best Practices Guidelines for Journals Editors [COPE]).
Guide to Good Practice of
Cuadernos Jovellanistas. De la Ilustración a la Modernidad
This Guide to Good Practice is intended as a code of conduct for the parties involved in the management and dissemination of the results published in the scientific journal Cuadernos Jovellanistas. De la Ilustración a la Modernidad: editorial team, authors and reviewers.
- Editorial Team of Cuadernos Jovellanistas. De la Ilustración a la Modernidad
The Editorial Team, together with the Director and the Secretary are responsible for the published contents, so they must ensure their scientific quality, avoid bad practices in the publication of research results and manage the publication of the papers received in a reasonable time.
The Editorial Team of the journal will designate the evaluators of the proposals, following the procedure established in this Guide.
This responsibility implies observance of the following principles:
1.1 Impartiality
The Editorial Team must be impartial when handling papers proposed for publication and must respect the intellectual independence of the authors, who must be recognized the right to reply in case of negative evaluation.
Papers presenting negative research results should not be excluded.
1.2 Confidentiality
The members of the Editorial Team are obliged to maintain confidentiality regarding the texts received and their content until they have been accepted for publication. Only then may their title and authorship be divulged.
Likewise, no member of the Editorial Team may use data, arguments or interpretations contained in unpublished works for his or her own research, except with the express written consent of the authors.
1.3 Review of papers
The Editorial Team must ensure that the published research papers have been evaluated by at least two specialists in the field, and that the review process has been fair and impartial.
The method used in peer review that best suits the scientific community to which the journal or collection is addressed should be made public: double-blind (anonymity of those who have carried out the work and the evaluation), blind (anonymity of those who carry out the evaluation) or open (without anonymity). When one of the two evaluations is negative, a third report will be requested.
The Editorial Team must consider the refusal of an author to be evaluated by certain specialists (in case the evaluation is not anonymous), if the reasons given are considered reasonable. The Editorial Team is not obliged to dispense with such specialists if it considers that their opinions are essential for the correct evaluation of the work.
Persons submitting a paper for evaluation may propose the names of up to three specialists for this task. The Editorial Team reserves the right to decide whether or not to accept this proposal, without being obliged to communicate this decision.
The Editorial Team must ensure the originality and unpublished nature of the works received, and must guarantee that in the evaluation process these aspects are also monitored and that plagiarism, self-plagiarism and redundant or duplicate publication, understood as the total, partial or altered copy of a work published by the same author to make it appear different, as well as falsified or manipulated data, are detected. In addition, the contents that are subject to peer review should be clearly indicated.
The Editorial Team should value and acknowledge the contribution of those who have collaborated in the evaluation of the papers submitted to the journal or collection. Likewise, it should encourage academic authorities to recognize peer review activities as part of the scientific process and should dispense with those who carry out evaluations of low quality, incorrect, disrespectful or delivered outside the established deadlines.
1.4 Acceptance or rejection of manuscripts
The responsibility for accepting or rejecting a paper for publication rests with the Editorial Team, which should base its decision on the reports received. These reports should reason their opinion on the quality of the work in terms of relevance, originality and clarity of exposition.
The Editorial Team may directly reject the papers received, without resorting to an external consultation process, if it considers them inappropriate due to their lacking the required level of quality, due to their not meeting the scientific objectives of the journal or collection, or due to their presenting evidence of scientific fraud.
1.5 De-authorisation of articles published in the journal and notice of irregularity
The Editorial Team reserves the right to de-authorise those articles already published whose unreliability is subsequently determined as a result of both unintentional errors and fraud or bad scientific practices: fabrication, manipulation or copying of data, plagiarism and self-plagiarism of texts and redundant or duplicate publication, omission of references to the sources consulted, use of contents without permission or without justification, etc. The objective guiding the deauthorisation is to correct the scientific production already published, ensuring its integrity.
The conflict of duplicity, caused by the simultaneous publication of an article in two journals, must be resolved by determining the date of receipt of the work in each of them.
If only part of the article contains an error, this can be rectified later by means of an editorial note or an erratum.
In case of conflict, the journal will ask the author(s) for explanations and evidence for clarification, and will make a final decision based on these.
The journal will obligatorily publish, in its printed and electronic versions, the news about the disavowal of a given text and the reasons for such a measure must be mentioned in it, in order to distinguish malpractice from unintentional error. The journal will also notify those responsible for the institution to which the author(s) of the article belong(s) of the deauthorisation. The decision to disavow a text should be taken as soon as possible, in order to ensure that the erroneous work is not cited in its field of research.
De-authored articles will be retained in the electronic edition of the journals, with a clear and unambiguous warning that it is a de-authored article, to distinguish it from other corrections or comments. In the printed edition, the disavowal shall be stated as soon as possible by means of an editorial or a communication, in the same terms as in the electronic version.
As a preliminary step to the final disavowal of an article, the journal may issue a notice of irregularity, providing the necessary information in the same terms as in the case of a disavowal. The irregularity notice will be maintained for the minimum time necessary, and will conclude with its withdrawal or with the formal disavowal of the article.
1.6 Application of the Regulatory Standard of Cuadernos Jovellanistas. De la Ilustración a la Modernidad
The people in charge of the journal’s management are responsible for the correct application of the rules that regulate the functioning of the Editorial Team and must ensure that its members are aware of them. These functions are: to promote and represent the journal in different forums; to suggest and support possible improvements; to seek the collaboration of leading specialists in the field; to review, in a first evaluation, the works received; to write editorials, reviews, comments, news, reviews, etc.; to attend the meetings of the Editorial Team.
1.7 Author Guidelines
Each journal’s editing requirements for the presentation of manuscripts (concerning the characteristics of the work, the format and resolution of Portadas, the system for bibliographical references, etc.) must be public.
1.8 Conflict of interest
A conflict of interest arises when a work received in the journal is signed, among other possible situations, by a person who is part of the Editorial Team, by someone who has a direct personal or professional relationship, or by someone who is closely related to the past or present research of the member of the Editorial Team. Specifically, members of the Editorial Team must refrain from handling an original when they incur in any of these or similar situations:
- being related,
- being friends or manifest enmity,
- being part of the same research group,
- participating or having participated in the direction or co-direction of a doctoral thesis in the last 10 years,
- having defended a doctoral thesis under the supervision or co-direction of the author(s) in the last 10 years,
- collaborating or having collaborated in publications or patents in the last 5 years,
- collaborating in other economic or scientific-technological activities,
- having a contractual relationship or sharing national or international research funds or projects, from public or private entities, or of any other nature, in the last 3 years.
The Editorial Team will also refrain from selecting reviewers who are or may be affected by any of these situations. When the evaluation is carried out by the blind method, maintaining only the anonymity of the evaluator, the Editorial Team will include the reasons for abstention in the evaluation form, so that the evaluator has the opportunity to know them and, if necessary, to abstain.
- Authorship of the articles in Cuadernos Jovellanistas. De la Ilustración a la Modernidad
The authors of the texts submitted for publication in Cuadernos Jovellanistas. De la Ilustración a la Modernidad are primarily responsible for their content, and are therefore obliged to apply an ethical standard designed to ensure their originality and due attribution of authorship, among other aspects. Inappropriate behaviour may result in the disavowal of published content, as set out in sections 1.5 and 1.6 of this Guide.
In addition to its ethical assessment, improper conduct may result in the infringement of the rights of the author or third parties, for which reason the Editorial Team of Cuadernos Jovellanistas. De la Ilustración a la Modernidad reserves the right to take appropriate legal Eliminar.
2.1 Publication guidelines
The texts submitted for publication must be the result of original and unpublished research. They must include the data obtained and used, as well as an objective discussion of the results. Sufficient information must be provided so that any specialist can reproduce the research carried out and confirm or refute the interpretations defended in the work.
Authors must adequately mention the origin of ideas or literal phrases taken from other published works in the manner indicated in the journal’s or collection’s regulations.
When Portadas are included as part of the research, a suitable explanation must be given of how they were created or obtained, provided that this is necessary for their understanding. In the case of total or partial reproduction of previously published graphic material (figures, photos, maps, etc.), the source must be cited, providing the relevant permissions for reproduction if necessary.
Unnecessary fragmentation of journal articles should be avoided. If the work is very extensive, it can be published in several parts, each part developing a particular aspect of the overall study. Related papers should be published in the same journal to facilitate their interpretation by readers.
2.2 Originality and plagiarism
Authors must ensure that the data and results presented in the paper are original and have not been copied, invented, distorted or manipulated.
Plagiarism in all its forms, self-plagiarism, multiple or redundant publication, as well as the invention or manipulation of data constitute serious ethical misconduct and are considered scientific fraud.
Authors must not send to Cuadernos Jovellanistas. De la Ilustración a la Modernidad original manuscripts that have previously been submitted for consideration by another publisher, nor will they send such manuscripts to another publisher until they have received notification of rejection or until they have voluntarily withdrawn them. However, it is acceptable to publish a paper that expands on a paper that has already appeared as a short note, communication or abstract in the proceedings of a conference, provided that the text on which it is based is properly cited and that the modifications involve a substantial change to what has already been published.
Secondary publications are also acceptable if they are aimed at completely different readerships, for example, if the work is published in different languages or if there is a version for specialists versus a version aimed at the general public. These circumstances should be specified and the original publication should be appropriately cited.
2.3 Authorship of the work
In the case of multiple authorship, the person responsible for the article must ensure that those who have contributed significantly to the conception, planning, design, execution, data collection, interpretation and discussion of the results of the work are acknowledged; in any case, all the persons signing the article share responsibility for the work presented. Likewise, the person responsible and the contact person must ensure that those who sign it have reviewed and approved the final version of the work and give their approval for its possible publication.
The person responsible for the work must ensure that none of the signatures responsible for the work have been omitted, nor have others been added that are not, and that the aforementioned co-authorship criteria are met, avoiding fictitious or gift authorship, which is bad scientific practice.
Likewise, the contribution of other persons who are not listed as signatories or responsible for the final version of the work should be acknowledged in an appropriate manner, by way of thanks.
If the Editorial Team considers it necessary or if the signatories of the work request it, the individual contribution of each member of the signatory group to the collective work will be described briefly in the published version.
2.4 Sources of information and funding
Publications that have influenced the research should be acknowledged in the text of the paper, and the original sources on which the information contained in the paper is based should be identified and cited in the bibliography. However, irrelevant citations or citations referring to similar examples should not be included, and references to research already established in the body of scientific knowledge should not be abused.
Authors should not use information obtained privately through conversations, correspondence or from discussions with colleagues in the field, unless they have explicit written permission from their source of information and the information has been received in the context of scientific advice.
The publication shall state clearly and concisely all sources of funding provided for the study, mentioning the private or public entity responsible for such funding, and the code number of such funding, where it exists. This information shall be included in the published work.
2.5 Significant errors in published works
When an author discovers a serious error in his or her work, he or she is obliged to inform those responsible for the journal as soon as possible, in order to modify his or her work, withdraw it, retract it or publish a correction or erratum.
If the possible error is detected by any of the members of the Editorial Team, the authors are obliged to demonstrate that their work is correct.
The process for resolving such conflicts is described in sections 1.5 and 1.6.
2.6 Conflict of interest
Where there are any commercial, financial or personal ties that may affect the results and conclusions of their work, the text of the work must be accompanied by a declaration stating these circumstances, which will appear in the published version of the work.
- Evaluation of scientific journal articles and monographs
Las personas que participan en la evaluación desempeñan un papel esencial en el proceso que garantiza la calidad de la publicación. Asisten al Equipo Editorial de la revista y en la toma de las decisiones editoriales, ayudan a la mejora de las obras publicadas, y aportan una garantía de acreditación científica.
3.1 Confidentiality
The reviewer must treat the work to be reviewed as a confidential document until publication, both during and after the review process.
Under no circumstances should you disseminate or use the information, details, arguments or interpretations contained in the text under review for your own benefit or that of others, or to the detriment of others. Only in special cases may they seek the advice of other specialists in the field, of which they must inform the management of the journal or collection.
3.2 Objectivity
The evaluator must judge objectively the quality of the entire work, i.e. including the information on which the working hypothesis is based, the theoretical and experimental data and their interpretation, without neglecting the presentation and writing of the text.
They must also specify their criticisms, and be objective and constructive in their comments. They must argue their judgements adequately, without adopting hostile positions and respecting the intellectual independence of the author of the work.
The reviewer must warn the reviewer of any relevant similarities between the work submitted for review and any other work published or in the process of being reviewed in another publication of which he/she is aware. Likewise, he/she must draw attention to texts or data plagiarised from others or from the same author(s) of the evaluated work, or to the suspicion or well-founded certainty that they are falsified, invented or manipulated.
3.3 Promptness of response
The reviewer must act promptly and must deliver the report within the agreed time and notify the journal or collection management of any delays.
If the reviewer does not feel able to judge the commissioned work, or feels that he/she cannot complete the task within the agreed deadline, he/she should inform the journal or collection management as soon as possible.
3.4 Acknowledgement of sources of information
Whoever carries out an evaluation should check that relevant works already published on the subject are cited. To this end, he/she will review the bibliography included in the text, suggesting the elimination of superfluous or redundant references, or the incorporation of others that have not been cited.
3.5 Conflict of interest
A reviewer should decline to review work if they suspect or know that it is included in any of the situations that may affect their judgement of that work, as described in section 1.9 of this Guide.
Conflicts of interest may also arise when the work to be reviewed is closely related to the work that the reviewer is currently working on or has already published. In these cases, when in doubt, he/she should relinquish the task entrusted and return the work to the Editorial Team, stating the reasons for such a decision.
Sources consulted:
Best Practices for Peer Review. Association of American University Presses (AAUP), 2016.
Centro de Investigación en Estudios de la Mujer CIEM-UCR. Guía breve para el uso no sexista del lenguaje. Cómo usar el lenguaje no discriminatorio en textos varios, presentaciones e ilustraciones, (s. f.). Recuperado de http://repositorio.ciem.ucr.ac.cr/bitstream/123456789/18/1/RCIEM009.pdf
Código de buenas prácticas científicas del CSIC. CSIC, Madrid, 2010.
Código de buenas prácticas científicas del CSIC. Anexo I: la responsabilidad de los autores en publicaciones multidisciplinares. CSIC, Madrid, 2010.
Comité de Ética del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Código de buenas prácticas del CSIC, (s. f.). Recuperado de https://www.ehu.eus/documents/2458096/2699121/VIIe_csic_cbp.pdf
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RetrEliminar Guidelines, 2009. Recuperado de http://publicationethics.org/files/retrEliminar%20guidelines_0.pdf
Declaración Nacional sobre Integridad Científica. COCE, CRUE, CSIC, Madrid, 2015.
Directrices. European Association of Science Editors (EASE)
Elsevier. Ethics in Research & Publication. (2014). Recuperado de https://www.publishingcampus.elsevier.com/websites/elsevier_publishingcampus/files/Guides/Brochure_Ethics_2_web.pdf
Guidelines. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, 2015. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Recuperado de http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
Ley N° 6683 sobre Derechos de Autor y Derechos Conexos, 2010. Recuperado de http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/es/text.jsp?file_id=247913
Ley N° 7979 que Reforma de la Ley N° 6683 de Derechos de Autor y Derechos Conexos y sus Reformas, Ley de Patentes de Invención, Dibujos y Modelos Industriales y Modelos de Utilidad, N° 6867 y sus Reformas y del Código Procesal Civil y sus Reformas, 2000. Recuperado de http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/es/text.jsp?file_id= 126070
Manual de Conflictos de Intereses del CSIC. CSIC, Madrid, 2015.
Norma Reguladora de las Publicaciones del CSIC. CSIC, Madrid, 2012.
Rojas Blanco, Lilliam y Rojas Porras, Marta Eugenia. Guía de uso del lenguaje inclusivo de género en el marco del habla culta costarricense, 2015. Recuperado de http://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/descargas/educare/pdfs/REE-LENGUAJE-INCLUSIVO.pdf
Universidad de Costa Rica. (2016). Reglamento de la Investigación. Recuperado de http://www.cu.ucr.ac.cr/uploads/tx_ucruniversitycouncildatabases/normative/investigacion_ucr.pdf
Vázquez Moctezuma, Salvador Enrique. Ética en la publicación de revistas académicas: percepción de los editores en ciencias sociales. Innovación Educativa, 16 (72), (septiembre-diciembre, 2016), 53-74.
